United States v. Abrogar’s Empirical Analysis
459 F.3d 430 · 2006
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently October 2024
4 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 33 U.S.C. § 1901 (Marine Plastic Pollution Research and Control Act of 1987) · 33 U.S.C. § 1902 · 33 U.S.C. § 1904 · 33 U.S.C. § 1908
Relies on United States v. Booker · United States v. Pojilenko
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all acts and omissions committed, aided, abetted, counseled, commanded, induced, procured, or willfully caused by the defendant ... that occurred during the commission of the offense of conviction, in preparation for that offense, or in the course of attempting to avoid detection or responsibility for that offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.