Buchheit v. Norris’s Empirical Analysis
459 F.3d 849 · 2006
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · McMann v. Richardson · Tollett v. Henderson · Vidrio-Aleman v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“point to a Supreme Court precedent that he thinks the [Arkansas] state courts acted contrary to or unreasonably applied”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Evenstad v. Carlson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.