Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 F.3d 990 - United States v. Johnson

United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

459 F.3d 990 · 2006

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
5
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably United States v. Heredia (2007), United States v. Palma (2008)

18 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions

240200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 10 U.S.C. § 920 · 18 U.S.C. § 17 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on Mathews v. United States · Bryan v. United States · Barrett v. United States · Small v. United States · United States v. Escobar de Bright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e will not require the government to contest motive in every § 922 case where the facts will bear an uncorroborated assertion by the defendant that he innocently came upon a firearm and was preparing to turn it over to the authorities when, alas, he was arrested.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The statute is precautionary; society deems the risk posed by felon-firearm possession too great even to entertain the possibility that some felons may innocently and temporarily possess such a weapon.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “focus on the motive or purpose of the current possession of firearms, but rather on the fact that a person with three or more violent felony or serious drug convictions currently possesses a firearm”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.