459 F. Supp. 267 - Huge v. Maximeadows Mining Co.’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (§ 502 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))
Relies on Arroyo v. United States · Local Union No. 5 of Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Mahoning & Trumbull County Building Trades Welfare Fund · Christensen v. New York Times Co. · 419 F. Supp. 1019 - Huge v. Old Home Manor, Inc. · Bugher v. OHIO PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the sole and exclusive benefit of the employees of [the contributing] employer,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.