People v. Hendrickson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the statement must provide an explanation or description of the perceived event, (2) the declarant must personally perceive the event, and (3) the explanation or description must be `substantially contemporaneous' with the event.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.