State v. McGraw’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Elmore v. State · 151 Ind. App. 176 - Helvey v. Wabash County REMC · Lund v. Commonwealth · Nash v. State · 418 So. 2d 847 - National Surety Corp. v. Applied Systems, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Inasmuch as the evidence clearly supports the fact that McGraw knowingly and intentionally used the city leased computer for his own monetary benefit, the only real question is whether 'use' of a computer is a property subject to theft. The sufficiency question will not be discussed separately." (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McGraw“unauthorized control over the property of the City of Indianapolis, Indiana, to-wit: the use of computers and computer services with intent to deprive the City of Indianapolis, * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McGraw
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.