Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 N.W.2d 406 - State v. Tapio

State v. Tapio’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2021 · most notably State v. Guthrie (2001), State v. Flippo (2002)

28 state decisions

1901990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Rakas v. Illinois · United States v. Matlock · Mincey v. Arizona · Harris v. New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “FACTUAL TEST Where a request has been made to charge the jury on a lesser-included offense, the duty of the trial judge is determined by the evidence. If evidence had been present which would support a conviction of a lesser charge, refusal to give the requested instruction would be reversible error_ There must be sufficient evidence, however, when read in the light most favorable to the defendant, which would justify a jury in concluding that the greater offense was not committed and that a lesser offense was in fact committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Homicide is manslaughter in the first degree when perpetrated: [[Image here]] (2) Without a design to effect death, and in the heat of passion, but in a cruel and unusual manner; (3) Without a design to effect death, but by means of a dangerous weapon; (4) Unnecessarily, either while resisting an attempt by the person killed to commit aucrime or after such attempt shall have failed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[His] age, his character, his record as to former crimes, educational background, and mental capacity; the legality or illegality of his arrest; the conditions of his incarceration; delay in arraignment; his removal to a distant jail; prolonged questioning... by the police[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.