Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 NW2D 435 - State v. Sondreal

State v. Sondreal’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Shank & Bradley · State v. Jenner · State v. Miller · State v. Reutter · State v. Dornbusch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal in a criminal case, the issue before this court is whether there is evidence in the record which, if believed by the jury, is sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “connect the defendant with the commission of the offense. The corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense, or the circumstances thereof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.