Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 NW2D 441 - State v. Peck

State v. Peck’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2007
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · United States v. Davis · United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan · Berra v. United States · State v. Shank & Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any person who injures, or threatens to injure, any person or property, or, with intent to influence a witness, offers, confers, or agrees to confer any benefit on a witness or prospective witness in an official proceeding to induce the witness to: (1) Testify falsely; [or] (2) Withhold any testimony, [or] information ... [[Image here]] is guilty of tampering with a witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The focus of anti-tampering statutes is on the actions and intent of the person trying to influence the witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.