Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 Pa. 129 - Commonwealth v. Rodgers

Commonwealth v. Rodgers’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
2
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

64 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently March 2007 · most notably Commonwealth v. Zettlemoyer (1982), Commonwealth v. Perkins (1977)

64 state decisions

2801974198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hamling v. United States · Roth v. United States · Miller v. California · Cooper v. State of California · Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a multitude of decisions, this Court has ruled that in evaluating the correctness of instructions to a trial jury, the charge must be read and considered as a whole, and it is the general effect of the charge that controls. For example, see Commonwealth v. Fell, 453 Pa. 531 , 309 A.2d 417 (1973); Commonwealth v. Zapata, 447 Pa. 322 , 290 A.2d 114 (1972); Commonwealth v. Heasley, 444 Pa. 454 , 281 A.2d 848 (1971); and Commonwealth v. Franklin, 438 Pa. 411 , 265 A.2d 361 (1970). ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “To say the jury need expert help to decide if this material is “obscene” borders on the ridiculous.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.