Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 Pa. 163 - Commonwealth v. Rowe

Commonwealth v. Rowe’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
2
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

96 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently January 1992 · most notably Commonwealth v. Goodwin (1975), Commonwealth v. Hughes (1989)

96 state decisions

760197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Mitchell · Killian v. United States · Commonwealth v. Futch · Commonwealth v. Garvin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Futch did not . . . establish a per se rule that all evidence obtained during an unnecessary delay be excluded. It is only upon the defendant’s showing of prejudice from the delay, i. e., a nexus between the delay and the challenged evidence that he is entitled to relief.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Initially, as we noted in Futch, if unnecessary delay follows the’securing of a confession, that evidence is not reasonably related to the subsequent delay. See, e. g., United States v. Mitchell, 322 U.S. 65 , 64 S.Ct. 896 , 88 L.Ed. 1140 (1944); Virgin Islands v. Gereau, 502 F.2d 914 (3d Cir. 1974). For as the Supreme Court stated in Mitchell, ‘the illegality of [an accused’s] detention does not retroactively change the circumstances under which he made the disclosures.’ 322 U.S. at 70 , 64 S.Ct. at 898 .” (Emphasis in original)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.