459 So. 2d 293 - Brewer v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2010
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 448 So. 2d 927 - Wilcher v. State · 401 So. 2d 1100 - Hughes v. State · 274 So. 2d 124 - Aikerson v. State · 393 So. 2d 1319 - Woods v. State · 338 So. 2d 1236 - Cuevas v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every person who shall, without lawful authority (1) forcibly seize and confine any other, (2) or shall inveigle or kidnap any other (3) with intent (a) to cause such person to be secretly confined or imprisoned in the state against his will, (b) or to cause such other person to be sent out of this state against his will, (c) or to cause such other person (1) to be deprived of his liberty, (2) or in any way held to service against his will... Under the statute the state must prove that a person, without lawful authority, either (1) forcibly seized and confined another person, or (2) inveigled or kidnapped another person, intending to subject such person to either (a), (b), or (c) above.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“that asportation was not a necessary ingredient of the indictment, so long as the indictment charges the victim was imprisoned against his will.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Carr v. State · Manning v. State“does not require any allegation of transportation of the victim,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Holly v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.