Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

459 So. 2d 316

459 So.2d 316

9 Fla.L.Weekly 488

Florida Bar v. Peterman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 21, 1984

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1984-11-21

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently April 1997

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-11-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This matter is before the Court on respondent’s Petition for Leave to Resign Permanently Without Leave to Reapply, pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.08 of the Integration Rule of The Florida Bar.

¶2The Florida Bar filed its response supporting the Petition and stating:

¶31. That Mr. Peterman is endeavoring to make restitution to his clients as noted in the Petition;

¶42. That Mr. Peterman has agreed to cooperate with any client security fund investigation made by The Florida Bar;

¶53. That Mr. Peterman has waived confidentiality of all disciplinary matters mentioned in his Petition for Resignation; and

¶64. That the Petition is without leave to apply for readmission permanently. Pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.08(6), of the Integration Rule, such condition shall preclude any readmission.

¶7The Court having reviewed the Petition for Leave to Resign and the response of The Florida Bar and determined that the requirements of Rule 11.08(3) are fully satisfied, the Petition for Leave to Resign Permanently Without Leave to Reapply is hereby approved, effective immediately.

¶8Costs in the amount of $184.40 are hereby taxed against respondent.

¶9It is so ordered.

ADKINS, A.C.J., and OVERTON, ALDERMAN, McDonald and SHAW, JJ., concur.
/459/so2d/316 · .json · Public domain