Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 So. 2d 426 - Stewart v. State

459 So. 2d 426 - Stewart v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2012
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 399 So. 2d 1137 - Vey v. Bradford Union Guidance Clinic, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It would be patently improper for this court to consider evidence which was not introduced for consideration in the lower court proceeding.”). However, we note that the procedural posture of this case presents an interesting question regarding the proper method for the state to introduce the current status of the defendant’s sentence where defense counsel preserves the argument of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.