Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 459 So. 2d 999 - Adams v. State

459 So. 2d 999 - Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
February 2002
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2002

7 state decisions

50198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte Grimmett · 30 Ala. App. 214 - Gilbert v. State · Cory v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Although the evidence for the State prior to its resting its case was woefully unclear and indefinite as to some particulars, we are able to determine with reasonable certainty from the evidence ... that the person who was seen by Parris Golfing [State’s witness] in the automobile of Keith Anthony [the victim of the breaking and entering] ... was either this appellant or his co-defendant_ In our opinion, the evidence thus considered constitutes substantial evidence that this appellant, either as the principal or as an aider or abettor, was guilty of the possession of burglar’s tools with the intent to use the tools in the commission of an offense involving forceful entry into the premises_” Id. at 1002 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “screwdriver, gloves, wire pliers and key cutters . . . with intent to use the same, in the commission of an offense involving forcible entry into premises or theft.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.