Illinois v. Gates Et Ux.’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
11
cited 11 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 1991
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Weeks v. United States · Picard v. Connor · Whitney v. People of State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]hether the rule requiring the exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment ... should to any extent be modified, so as, for example, not to require the exclusion of evidence obtained in the reasonable brief that the search and seizure at issue was consistent with the Fourth Amendment. Illinois v. Gates, 459 U.S. 1028 , 103 S.Ct. 436 , 74 L.Ed.2d 595 (1982).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'The Court has consistently refused to decide federal constitutional issues raised here for the first time on review of state court decisions. . . .'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Batson v. Kentucky“[T]here is no impediment to presenting a new argument as an alternative basis for affirming the decision below”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Batson v. Kentucky
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.