Almonte v. KURL’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Addington v. Texas · O'Connor v. Donaldson · Jones v. United States · 33 Cal. 2d 80 - Summers v. Tice · Nation-Wide Check Corporation Inc v. Forest Hills Distributors Inc Nation-Wide Check Corporation Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“requires a factual finding that the harm would not have occurred but for the [act] and that the harm [was a] natural and probable consequence of the [act].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“where negligence on the part of ... defendants is clear, and it is only the issue of causation which is in doubt, so that the choice must be made between letting loss due to failure of proof fall upon the innocent plaintiff or the culpable defendants.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A plaintiff must not only prove that a defendant is the cause-in-fact of an injury, but also must prove that a defendant proximately caused the injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.