Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 Ala. 72

Brigman v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1871

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1871-06-15

Brigman and others have filed in this court a transcript of the record and proceedings upon a forfeited undertaking of bail in the circuit court of Dallas, from which it appears that Brigman, having been indicted for forgery, he and others entered into an undertaking of bail for hi a appearance at the nest term of court. Failing to do this, judgment nisi was rendered against the obligors on said undertaking of bail, which was afterwards made final.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1921

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1871-06-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PEOK, O. J.

¶1On looking into this transcript, we find no where in the record, or the certificate of the clerk of the circuit court, any evidence that an appeal was taken, or any appeal bond, or security for the costs of an appeal, given, as required by § 3509 of the Eevised Code; consequently, the case is not properly in this court, and we can take no jurisdiction of it, either to hear it, or to dismiss it as an appeal irregularly and improperly here. The only order we can make is, to direct the case to befstricken off the docket. This we must do to get the case out of our way.

¶2Let the case be stricken from the docket, because no appeal appears to have been taken.

/46/ala/72 · .json · Public domain