46 Ala. App. 175 - Henry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Stovall v. Denno · Gilbert v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We understand the law to be that the court’s refusal to permit defense counsel to see and examine a report used by a witness on the stand to refresh his memory would constitute reversible error. McMurtrey v. State, 44 Ala.App. 658 , 219 So.2d 414 ; Benefield v. State, 39 Ala.App. 302 , 100 So.2d 334 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“. . . to extend the above rule to include the production of reports or memoranda, etc., reviewed before coming to Court to refresh the witnesses recollection . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hill v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.