In Re MacK’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2015
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1306 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 523 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 542 · 11 U.S.C. § 547 · 11 U.S.C. § 549 · 42 U.S.C. § 602 (§ 402 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Segal v. Rochelle · Kokoszka v. Belford · Fidelity Mortgage Investors v. Camelia Builders, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[[Image here]] (2) under subsection (a) of this section, of the collection of alimony, maintenance, or support from property that is not property of the estate;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.