Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Cal. 3d 712 - People v. Easley

46 Cal. 3d 712 - People v. Easley’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
4
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently December 2017 · most notably People v. Alvarez (1996), People v. Doolin (2009)

72 state decisions

3901988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 6002

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Glasser v. United States · Brady v. United States · Cuyler v. Sullivan · Kastigar v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “counsel `pulled his punches,' i.e., failed to represent defendant as vigorously as he might have had there been no conflict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]t is important to recognize that `adverse effect on counsel's performance' under [ Cuyler v.] Sullivan, supra, 446 U.S. at pages 348 and 350 [64 L.Ed.2d at pages 346, 348], is not the same as `prejudice' in the sense in which we often use that term. When, for example, we review a `traditional' claim of ineffective assistance of counsel (i.e., one involving asserted inadequate performance as opposed to `conflicted' performance), we require the defendant to show a reasonable probability that the result (i.e., the disposition) would have been different. [Citations.] ... As we suggested in Mroczko, supra, Sullivan requires an inquiry into whether the record shows that counsel `pulled his punches,' i.e., failed to represent defendant as vigorously as he might have had there been no conflict. [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`a defendant who raised no objection at trial must demonstrate that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyer's performance.' [Citations.] The Court in [ Cuyler v.] Sullivan [(1980) 446 U.S. 335, 348 ( 64 L.Ed.2d 333, 346-347 , 100 S.Ct. 1708 )] made clear that such a defendant must `show[] that his counsel actively represented conflicting interests,' and `the possibility of conflict is insufficient to impugn a criminal conviction.' [Citation.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.