Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Cal. App. 665 - De Bairos v. Barlin

46 Cal. App. 665 - De Bairos v. Barlin’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably 9 Cal. 2d 336 - Koyer v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance (1937), 120 Cal. App. 32 - Eade v. Reich (1932)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 35 state decisions

1101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Boone v. Templeman · American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. Butler · State v. McCauley · Stevinson v. Joy · Fairchild-Gilmore-Wilton Co. v. Southern Refining Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The use to which such a lot may be put in the future is uncertain. The defendant may have had an idea at the time of purchasing, of using the place as a home, but he was not bound by that intention. It was his privilege to use the lot in any manner that might be most profitable at any later date, or to sell the same for use by others. There might be many uses to which an eighty foot lot could be put which would not be equally well met by a seventy-seven and one-half foot lot. The sale value of such a lot might be materially different if it contained eighty front feet, than it would be if it contained only seventy-seven and one-half feet, and the difference in value, we think, would not be a matter of exact measurement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.