People v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2014
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 33 Cal. 3d 572 - People v. Fosselman · 7 Cal. 4th 380 - People v. Ewoldt · 53 Cal. 3d 771 - People v. Cooper · 2 Cal. 4th 629 - People v. Clair · 50 Cal. 3d 907 - People v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the policy of judicial economy would be thwarted by not allowing the trial court to proceed in correcting an error of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]n a criminal case, no statute permits or prohibits a trial court from amending its ruling on a motion for new trial before judgment,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[a] trial court obviously cannot reconsider its new trial motion ruling after it has lost jurisdiction over the case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.