State v. Cummings’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably State v. Buhl (2016), 101 Conn. App. 298 - State v. Russell (2007)
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · Cupp v. Naughten · Johnson v. Righetti · Soto v. United States · Lewis v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Alarm' is defined as 'to strike with fear: fill with anxiety as to threatening danger or harm....' Webster's Third New International Dictionary [1993].”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“makes a telephone call, whether or not a conversation ensues, in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.