Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Conn. Super. Ct. 149 - Joyner v. Hmurcik

46 Conn. Super. Ct. 149 - Joyner v. Hmurcik’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gurliacci v. Mayer · Sadloski v. Town of Manchester · Antinerella v. Rioux · Malasky v. Metal Products Corp. · Koennicke v. Maiorano

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough the legislature has expressly allowed substituted service upon the commissioner for resident motor vehicle operators whose whereabouts are unknown, the provisions of § 52-63 are revoked upon the death of the resident motor vehicle operator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] judgment in an action begun and prosecuted against a defendant who is dead when it was begun, is null and void and may be attacked collaterally as well as directly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.