Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Del. 339 - Poole v. Hudson

Poole v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 1978
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Flach v. Gottschalk Co. · Sutcliffe v. Heatley · Warwick v. Addicks · Poole v. Newark Trust Co. · Industrial Trust Co. v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[ I]f no circumstances of unfairness, fraud, duress or undue influence appear, the reasoning powers must be so impaired as to render the person actually incapable of comprehending and acting rationally in the particular transaction. Warwick v. Addicks, 5 W.W.Harr. 43 , 157 A. 205 (1931); 17 C.J.S. Contracts, § 133, page 479.” Poole v. Hudson, supra, at 704 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.