Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 Del. 418 - Maher v. Voss

Maher v. Voss’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
7
states following
January 1971
most recently cited

2 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 1971

2 district · 15 state decisions

80195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Comeau v. Comeau · Greenfield v. Miller · Wool v. Larner · Goldberg v. Straus · Cosgrave v. Malstrom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * No liability rests upon a possessor of land, even to a business visitor, for bodily injury caused by a dangerous condition on the land, if the visitor knows of the condition and realizes the risk involved. But the possessor is subject to liability to gratuitous licensees if, and only if, he (a) knows of the condition and realizes that it involves an unreasonable risk to the licensee and has reason to be- Heve that they will not discover the condition or realize the risk, and (b) invites or permits the guests to enter or remain upon the land without exercising reasonable care to make the condition reasonably safe or to warn them of the condition and the risk involved therein. The owner is not obliged to prepare a safe place for the licensee’s use, but his duty is satisfied if he discloses the known condition of peril to the guest. * *”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.