Anderson v. Saint’s Empirical Analysis
46 F. 760 · 1891
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 1893
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Atlantio Works v. Brady Brady · Gorham Company v. White · Rosenthal v. Walker · Hollister v. Benedict Burnham Manuf'G · Rubber Company v. Goodyear
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Keeping in mind the limihitioim and principles oC ilie cases I have cited, I think tins design shows invention. Ii is necessarily a small invention. The complainant was restricted within narrow limits. His mantels must conform to the general shape and configuralion oí mantels, to be of any utility. To be-marketable, the design must be simple, not elaborate. Remembering this, the design shows Invention. - s * It is a conventional design, and, while some of its elements are old, still the combination luis been into a new and harmonious dí-árit. * * s It presentí, a different impression to the eye from anything which lias preceded it, and is pleasing and attractive. The loslimonv shovvs that eoiunlairmnt's mantel lias commended itself to the trade, and ln> mednueJy became popula r. This pabilo acceptance is to be considered as per sun si vo in favor of the patent,””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. Monroe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.