Jones v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
46 F.2d 197 · 1931
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2016
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on O'Connell v. Schmidt · 8 App. D.C. 93 - Yates v. Huson · Woods v. Poor · 15 App. D.C. 135 - Griffin v. Swenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each case where diligence is involved, rests and must be decided upon its own facts, and all the surrounding circumstances must be viewed and considered in determining whether there was sufficient diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“possible interval from April 16th to early in July . . . in which it did not "affirmatively appear that any steps were being taken,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“possible interval from April 16th to early in July . . . in which it did not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.