In re Einstein’s Empirical Analysis
46 F.2d 373 · 1931
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently February 1955
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Grinnell Washing Mach Co v. E E Johnson Co · Dececo Co. v. George E. Gilchrist Co. · In re Prescott · In re McConnell · Wappler Electric Co. v. Bronx Hospital & Dispensary
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Two distinct claims for the same substantial matter, differing only in nonessen-tials, cannot both be sustained.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In re Barnett · In re Wood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.