Henry v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
46 F.2d 640 · 1931
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2003
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 171
Relies on Bronson v. Schulten · Phillips v. Negley · United States v. Gettysburg Electric Railway Co. · Ex Parte Charles Sibbald v. The United States · Sherman v. . McKeon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While there is no statute of limitations in equity, yet it generally in this respect follows the law, and will, in the absence of special extenuating circumstances . . . regard the delay as inexcusable and refuse relief after the time of the statute of limitations in that particular locality has expired.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.