Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 F.2d 852 - Graceffo v. United States

Graceffo v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

46 F.2d 852 · 1931

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
February 1974
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1974

17 federal appellate · 3 district ·

7019311940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Union Pacific Coal Co. v. United States · Van Gorder v. United States · Vernon v. United States · Salinger v. United States · Siden v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““There was a legal presumption that each of the defendants was innocent until he was proved to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The burden was upon the government to make this proof, and evidence of facts that are as consistent with innocence as with guilt is insufficient to sustain a conviction. Unless there is substantial evidence of facts which exclude every other hypothesis but that of guilt, it is the duty of the trial court to instruct the jury to return a verdict for the accused;, and where all the substantial evidence is as consistent with innocence as with guilt, it is the duty of the appellate court to reverse a judgment of conviction. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.