Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 F.3d 1114

Docket No. 94-1984.

Berg v. State of RI

This page is marked noindex.

First Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-02-08

Relies on Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co. · Lancellotti v. Fay · United States v. Doyle

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-02-08

NOTICE: First Circuit Local Rule 36.2(b)6 states unpublished opinions may be cited only in related cases.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island [Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge ]

Janice M. Berg on brief pro se.

D.R.I.

AFFIRMED.

Before TORRUELLA, Chief Judge, CYR and STAHL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Plaintiff's action essentially sought federal court review of state family court proceedings. Because lower federal courts do not have the authority to review such proceedings, we affirm the dismissal of plaintiff's action. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 415-16 (1923); Lancellotti v. Fay, 909 F.2d 15, 17 (1st Cir. 1990).

¶2

Affirmed.

/46/f3d/1114 · .json · Public domain