Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 F.3d 1128

Docket No. 93-6912.

United States v. Arch A. Moore, Jr.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: December 20, 1994 Decided: January 9, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-01-09

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Maxwell

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-01-09

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-89-263-G, CA-92-600)

Glen Mark, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Harry L. Hobgood, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mark, Nos. CR-89-263-G; CAn-92-600 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Mark's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied

/46/f3d/1128 · .json · Public domain