Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 F.3d 1129

Docket No. 94-7216.

Venable v. Wright

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Dec. 13, 1994. Decided Jan. 19, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-01-19

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Ward

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-01-19

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

James Eugene Venable, appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Venable v. Wright, No. CA-93-620 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also deny Appellant's motion for transfer to another prison

/46/f3d/1129 · .json · Public domain