Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 F.3d 1192 - In Re Oliver L. North (Garrett Fee Application)

In Re Oliver L. North (Garrett Fee Application)’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
July 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on In Re Oliver L. North (Dutton Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Shultz Fee Application) · In Re Oliver North (Gardner Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Gadd Fee Application) · In Re Oliver L. North (Platt Fee Application)

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “accept this as a basis for awarding attorneys' fees. The purpose of the Act is to promote a vigorous and thorough investigation of criminal allegations by the independent counsel.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “unprecedented both in terms of its scope and intensity.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.