Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 F.3d 21 - Woods v. Simpson

Woods v. Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

46 F.3d 21 · 1995

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
March 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 2021

3 federal appellate ·

601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6321 (Federal Tax Lien Act of 1966) · 26 U.S.C. § 6334

Relies on United States v. City of New Britain · United States v. Burke · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Jacobson · United States Internal Revenue Service v. J McDermott · United States v. Centennial Savings Bank FSB

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given our conclusion that 26 U.S.C. § 6334(a)(8) does not exempt an inheritance from levy, we need not decide whether 26 U.S.C. § 6334 also operates to exempt certain property from a 26 U.S.C. § 6321 federal lien for taxes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “where general words follow specific words in a statutory enumeration, the general words are construed to embrace only objects similar in nature to those objects enumerated by the preceding specific words.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “received by individuals on a weekly and other than weekly basis. Clearly”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.