Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 F.3d 377 - MacMillan v. United States

MacMillan v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

46 F.3d 377 · 1995

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Santos v. United States (2009), Kahale v. City and County of Honolulu (2004)

7 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1345 · 28 U.S.C. § 2401

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Kubrick · Francis v. Franklin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Instead, the limitations period begins to run when the plaintiff has ‘knowledge of facts that would lead a reasonable person (a) to conclude that there was a causal connection between the treatment and injury or (b) to seek professional advice, and then with that advice, to conclude that there was a causal connection between the treatment and injury.’ ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A tort against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.