Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 F.3d 54 - Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission

Destination Ventures, Ltd. v. Federal Communications Commission’s Empirical Analysis

46 F.3d 54 · 1995

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
7
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably American States Insurance v. Capital Associates of Jackson County, Inc. (2004), CE Design Ltd. v. King Architectural Metals, Inc. (2011)

16 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions

280199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 227

Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. Fox · City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc. · Edenfield v. Fane · Ristaino v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods or services which is transmitted to any person without that person's prior express invitation or permission.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the cost of one page of paper used by the typical fax machine in use today is two and one-half cents,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “between this interest and the ban on fax advertisements. Specifically, it contends that the government has not shown that faxes containing advertising are any more costly to consumers than other unsolicited faxes such as those containing political or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.