Ryder v. Oc Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis
46 F.3d 59 · 1995
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Sanders v. United States · McCleskey v. Zant · Sawyer v. Whitley · Hiatt v. Indiana State Student Assistance Commission · Perry v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if it (1) successively' repeats claims previously decided on the merits, or (2) abusively' asserts new grounds unjustifiably omitted from a prior petition.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“respondents' successive petition argument and, if necessary, [to] full[y] consider[ ] ... petitioner's claims. The court should also determine whether petitioner's claims constitute an abuse of the writ, should respondents choose to raise that defense on remand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ryder v. Oc Jenkins“Abusive claims are new claims not raised in a previous petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.