Singleton v. Cannon

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 4, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-09-04

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2003

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-09-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Charlena Singleton appeals the district court’s orders denying her motion to reopen her case and her motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Singleton v. Cannon, No. CA-99-3636-2-18 (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.