Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 F. App'x 198

Brasington v. Brasington

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 23, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-09-23

Relies on Brasington v. Brasington

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-09-23

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Boyce Allen Brasington appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order determining that a marital debt was not dischargeable in his bankruptcy proceeding. Our review of the record and the opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brasington v. Shapiro, 274 B.R. 159 (D.Md.2002). The Appellees’ motions for summary affirmanee/dismissal, for sanctions, and to impose an appeal bond are hereby denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/46/fappx/198 · .json · Public domain