Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 F. App'x 214

Gulden v. White

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 24, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-09-24

Decided 2002-09-24

PER CURIAM.

¶1Charles A. Gulden appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gulden v. White, No. CA-01-1519 (E.D.Va. May 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED.

/46/fappx/214 · .json · Public domain