Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

46 F. App'x 712

Edmonds v. Grissom

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-09-27

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-09-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Luther C. Edmonds appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to *713 reconsider prior orders dismissing his civil action and imposing sanctions against him. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Grissom, No. CA-98-488 (E.D.Va. Mar. 27, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/46/fappx/712 · .json · Public domain