Rollins v. Angelone

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-09-27

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2003

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-09-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Cameron J. Rollins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Rollins has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Rollins v. Angelone, No. CA-01-1664-AM (E.D.Va. Jan. 4, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.