Nickens v. Pearson

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-09-30

Cited by 42 later decisions (21 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2019 · most notably United States v. Brown (2002), Crowell v. Mississippi (2003)

2 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2002-09-30

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Theodore M. Nickens appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nickens v. Pearson, No. CA-00-805-3 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.