Rio Grande v. Keys’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Carson v. American Brands, Inc. · Forest Guardians v. Babbitt · Essence, Inc. v. City of Federal Heights · William Charles Payton v. Jeanne Woodford
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[U]nless and until consultation actually results in a decision to use their water — which may never happen — any `injury in fact' to their interests attributable to the district court's order”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.