¶1This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the court upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Harrison v. Thurston, 11 Fla. 307; Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325; Ropes v. Eldridge, 39 Fla. 47, 21. South. Rep. 570.
46 Fla. 241
Marsh v. Bennett
Decided June 15, 1903
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1903-06-15
<p>This case was decided by Division A.</p> <p>Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia county.</p> <p>The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1905
2 state decisions
Relies on Gates v. Hayner · Harrison v. Thurston · Ropes v. Eldridge
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1903-06-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →