Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 FSUPP2D 3 - Cone v. Caldera

Cone v. Caldera’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2000
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Castaneda v. Partida · Service v. Dulles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “based on the premise that in a representative sample of 100 officers of the same grade or grade grouping (Army-wide), the relative potential of such a sample will approximate a bell-shaped normal distribution pattern.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that in 4 a representative sample of 100 officers of the same grade or grade grouping (Army-wide) only one officer can reasonably be expected to be placed in the top block.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “strong but rebut- table presumption that administrators of the military, like other public officers, discharge their duties correctly,lawfully, and in good faith”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.