Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 46 INDAPP 32 - Laudeman v. Russell & Co.

Laudeman v. Russell & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
5
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently May 2000 · most notably 105 Ind. App. 574 - Holland Furnace Co. v. Nauracaj (1938), McIntosh v. Melroe Co. (2000)

16 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

1101910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. . Winchester · Consolidated Stone Co. v. Summit · Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. Duel · Bishop v. Weber · Daugherty v. Herzog

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in order to make a vendor liable (in such a case as this) who sells an article not in itself of an imminently dangerous character, it must be averred that he had actual knowledge of the defect or danger.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.